the package 2: son of stimulus.

Remember that economic stimulus package that was passed around the country (still President Bush really gets around, har har har)? You know, the one that didn’t really do much for us because it’s the same amount of money we usually get for our birthdays and Christmas/Hanukkah/Kwanzaa/L. Ron Hubbard Day/whatever else people celebrate? Well, we might be able to “see a sequel” birthday money from the President! He actually doesn’t want to share the wealth (at least, not within this country), but the Democrats, as always, are more than willing to let us in on a little bit of government spending.
Some “experts” (I do not see anyone with a PhD on that list, and I only listen to people who paid enough money to add “Dr.” to their names, like Dr. Phil) say that the $100 billion that was doled out to us didn’t stimulate anything economically (except in whore houses) because instead of spending money, we all just put it in our bank accounts. Hey, I’ll have you know that I spent mine on a Ringo Starr ticket. Many people are also saying that Congress won’t do shit unless we reach an economic crisis that would “scare the members” (make them watch the Ring as “enhanced interrogation”), and that they would have to call it a “tax cut” instead (a $300 tax cut?).
I can understand why the so-called economic “experts” are scared of a sequel to the stimulus package. Sequels aren’t always bad, though, except for Spider Man 2 and 3, Star Wars Episode I-III, Starship Troopers 2, Van Wilder: The Rise of Taj, the Matrix Reloaded, Legally Blonde 2, Ocean’s 12, Dirty Dancing: Havana Nights, and I refuse to believe that they made a third Godfather.
But, hey, look on the bright side- … … …

[Lola.]